Thursday, October 15, 2015

Negotiating with a Paranoid Schizophrenic Subject

 BY:  Samuel A. Farina, Jr.
NYAHN President and Retired Deputy Chief of Rochester (NY) Police Department

On August 14, 2013 in St. Joseph, Louisiana, headlines on CBS news read the following, “The gunman in a fatal hostage standoff wrote that he was angry at his ex-girlfriend's family and believed they were responsible for a device in his head…”

20-year-old Fuaed Abdo Ahmed shot two hostages, killing one, at a rural Louisiana bank before state police ended the 12-hour long standoff by shooting him dead. Admed indicated during the negotiation that he had a device in his head and wanted to have it removed.  Fearing for the safety of the two hostages Admed held and who actively threatened to harm, a tactical solution was employed in an attempt to save the lives of the hostages.  It was learned during the hostage situation that Ahmed was diagnosed and suffered from Paranoid Schizophrenia. 

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disorder that affects about (1) one percent of people all over the world. People with schizophrenia sometimes hear voices others don’t hear, believe that others are broadcasting their thoughts to the world, or become convinced that others are plotting to harm them. These experiences can make them fearful and withdrawn and cause difficulties when they try to have relationships with others.

Most individuals with schizophrenia are not violent; more typically, they are withdrawn and prefer to be left alone. However, studies indicate that except for those persons with a record of criminal violence before becoming ill, and those with substance abuse or alcohol problems, people with schizophrenia are not especially prone to violence.  There are other studies that suggest that probability of violence with schizophrenics is five times higher than those absent the disorder. About one-third of individuals with schizophrenia attempt suicide. Schizophrenia is treatable with both medication and therapy. 

Substance abuse significantly raises the rate of violence in people with schizophrenia but also in people who do not have any mental illness. People with paranoid and psychotic symptoms, which can become worse if medications are discontinued, may also be at higher risk for violent behavior. When violence does occur, it is most frequently targeted at family members and friends, and more often takes place at home.

Negotiators who engage someone who is schizophrenic will observe situations of thought disturbances, hallucinations, delusions and other departures from reality.  It is important to address this situation with a number of specific communication strategies in an effort to resolve the situation peacefully and, at the same time, having a tactical plan at the ready in the event there is a need to save hostages, especially family or friends of the subject.

As with all negotiations, communication strategies have a foundation in utilizing Active Listening Skills to build a trusting relationship through rapport building.  This will prove to be a significant challenge with someone who is schizophrenic.  Due to the paranoia that routinely exists with those who have schizophrenia, building relationship and trust probably will not develop.  Efforts to stall for time to promote fatigue will be your best strategy to resolve a crisis event.  Listen and provide empathy while being based in reality will allow for the subject tire.  Avoid arguing and keep the conversation ongoing to encourage ventilation, gain intelligence, gain an understanding as to the subject’s state of mind, and gauge their level of episodic condition. 

The negotiator should be asking questions such as:
  •             What medications are you taking?
  •             Are you taking your medications?
  •             Have you stopped taking your medication?
  •             What are the voices saying or what are they telling you?
  •             What are you seeing?
  •             Do you want to hurt yourself?

Access to a mental health professional as a resource to develop a personality and psychological profile would prove useful with understating medications and their effects, the psychological history of the subject and a more specific communication strategy.  Given the frustration that may exist with mental health care providers and those with mental illness who are in crisis, offering psychiatric services in the early stages of the negotiation may prove counterproductive. 

Mediations prescribed today for schizophrenia could have a timely effect if taken during a crisis event and the subject should be encouraged to take their prescription during the negotiation.  Often times the main reason for discontinuing the use of medications is a result of the adverse side effects that consist of such ailments as headaches, nausea, impotence and involuntary muscle contractions. 

Appealing to the subject’s emotion of having to live with hallucinations and/or delusions should be expressed.  Maintain reality and don’t fall victim to joining in with the subject’s distorted thinking or behavior.  Ask intelligent questions about the subject’s hallucinations or delusions specific to what they are experiencing. 

Know that during the negotiation with a schizophrenic you will be quickly be exhausted and frustrated by the situation.  An appeal to the subject’s ego will go a long way.  In addition, the use of the media as a means to publicly outline the paranoid’s concerns may be an option as a resolution strategy. 

These types of negotiations will prove to be the most taxing and mentally challenging.  It is important to stay in our own reality and not enter into the subject’s distorted world.  Stay true to the process of using time as a means to promote fatigue and continuous communication.  Constant risk assessment will be necessary with the schizophrenic especially when there is evidence substance abuse in combination of having hostages who are relatives/friends.  There may be a need to quickly transition to a tactical solution if there are communicated threats directed toward others.  Keep in mind suicide as a potential concern during the course of any crisis situation and have an affinity for extreme patience and enhanced flexibility. 

Monday, October 12, 2015

FBI’s most dangerous hostage crisis: The Vietnam veteran who stole a child


ON A cold January day in rural Alabama, a Vietnam veteran with a grudge against the world climbed on to a school bus, shooting the driver and abducting a five-year-old boy to his underground bunker.
Jimmy Lee Dykes, a 65-year-old former truck driver with a terrifying reputation, held Ethan Gilman captive for a week in what has been called one of the most dangerous and difficult hostage cases the FBI has faced.
More than two years on, The Wall Street Journal has gone back inside the heart-stopping standoff, using interviews, recordings, photos and documents to tell the story of an angry man with nothing left to lose. Dykes had no relationship with his two daughters and ex-wife, and had gained a reputation for his vicious treatment of local pets — threatening neighbours, and a deep resentment of the government.
...the FBI Critical Incident Response unit sent a Boeing 727 packed with criminal profilers, bomb experts, attack dogs, crisis managers and the Hostage Rescue Team, who set up at an old building that had been an antique store, restaurant and strip club.
Read more from News.com.au [HERE].